Blatant HP Job Ad

One aspect of the H-1B work visa program that I frequently emphasize — yes, yes, that I harp on — is that a core issue of H-1B is age. Younger workers are cheaper, and the vast majority of H-1Bs are young.

Concomitant with that is that the few Americans that U.S. employers do deign to hire as programmers tend to be new or recent grads. (Note: See Hal Salzman’s research for justification of my word few here.) Intel even has acronyms NCG (new college graduate) and RCG (recent CG), and earmarks jobs accordingly. This is common among the large employers, and I’ve pointed in the past to specific job ads like this for Intel, Facebook and so on.This discriminatory practice is of questionable legality, according to a prominent employment lawyer I asked a few years ago, but no one has ever challenged it.

Yesterday an alert reader came across an HP job ad that is not only is explicitly excusionary toward older American workers, but is also apparently exclusionary toward Americans, period. The position is for an Associate Software Engineer (odd title, more on this below) in Roseville, CA, a major HP site, near Sacramento. Here’s what it says.

First, it states that only NCGs/RCGS need apply:

Must be a recent graduate (2015) or graduating by January 2016.

Second, it has the following odd requirement (emphasis added):

Good written and verbal communication skills; mastery in English and local language.

My reader joked, “Hey, does Roseville have a local dialect of English?”

Of course, it’s clear what is likely happening here: HP has a foreign student that they want to hire, for a job requiring some foreign language, and they want to justify sponsoring the student for a green card, hence the language requirement.

Some of you will say, “But this is a legitimate use of the H-1B/green card programs. They need to hire a foreign worker, because they need the foreign language.” Well, you’re wrong. There are many programmers, born abroad but now naturalized U.S. citizens who almost certainly could do that job. Their only problem is that they’re not cheap, which brings me to the issue of that job title.

“Associate” Software Engineer? Are you kidding me, HP? This is NOT a standard job title, and it is reminiscent of the Junior Programmer titled used by the Indian IT services firms. It is clearly a device to set a lowball salary.It is also an additional mechanism to exclude the older Americans, who would be rejected as “overqualified.”

As I’ve often mentioned, the age issue could be easily fixed. Congress merely would replace the four-tiered system for determining prevailing wage, the legal wage floor for H-1B/green cards, by a single level, not broken down by age/experience.

Once again, what is sadly overlooked in the recent cases in which H-1Bs were used to replace American workers at Disney and SCE is that the foreign workers were cheap due to their AGE, or more precisely speaking, their low level of experience, which qualified them for the lowest of the four wage tiers.

The bills introduced in the past by Senators Grassley and Durbin would have changed the current four-level structure to a single level, in which prevailing wage would be defined as the 50th percentile salary for the given occupation and the given region — and NOT for a given experience level. DPE, and more recently EPI, have even suggested using the 75th percentile, on the grounds that the industry claims the H-1Bs are “the best and the brightest” or have rare skills, something employers would have to pay more for on the open market. In this light, I strongly recommend Daniel Costa’s recent op-ed (though I disagree with his focus on the IT services firms).

Advertisements

6 thoughts on “Blatant HP Job Ad

  1. I was a victim of HP’s blatant (w) age discrimination. & I know MANY recently departed HPers who were blatantly being pushed out the door. It’s no secret, yes the Department of Labor could care less.

    The best action on everyone’s part is to loudly boycott HP, ensure that Meg Whitman gets early retirement, hopefully without a golden parachute.

    The biggest question on my mind is who gets to pull the handle for that last flush?

    Like

  2. Maybe the job is in California and they mean Spanish or Chinese.

    Y’know, even five or ten years ago the most irritating thing, and used as a tool in the H-1B game, was the employer “buzzword” preference, requiring X years of experience with tool T (release R) or you could not be considered. Now when I encounter that (like yesterday), I look at the employer and think, “Wow, are you old school!” New employers have totally unreasonable expectations for tools and processes that do not even exist! I’m talking “full-stack” and “devops”. These mean just whatever you want them to mean, so employers have full discretion to make arbitrary decisions for unstated reasons but we know what they are, and never really have to explain themselves.

    You will note that older workers, meaning anyone with more than about one year’s experience, probably will be accused of being wedded to an actual, existing set of practices! Can’t have that!

    Liked by 1 person

  3. Republican presidential hopeful Carly Fiorina was a great firer and H-1B user at Hewlett-Packard before she herself was fired, with a $50 million severance package to ease the pain, coincidentally her current net worth. It was reported in a trade journal at the time that HP employees were skipping in the halls, singing ‘Ding Dong, the Witch is Dead.’

    And a reminder:

    http://venturebeat.com/2015/01/20/disposable-employees-may-be-tech-industrys-greatest-achievement/

    ‘HP’s layoff count has climbed over 120,000 since 2002. It’s an amazing number for a company that remains profitable.

    And how’s all that cutting working out? I don’t think anyone would argue HP is anything but still adrift.’

    Liked by 1 person

  4. Yes, the dialect in Roseville, CA is like totally different from the dialect in Roseville, MN eh.

    So, if they’re only willing to hire 35%-50% of recent/new US college grads, and they’re even less interested in considering 36-year-old US citizen STEM pros, does that leave the latter at closer to 5% or 34% employed (and 95%-66% employed)?

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s